My bad: Is EDC fuel flow accurate?
href="http://www.panbo.com/assets_c/2010/03/VolvoPenta_TAMD74C_fuel_curve-1858.html">
March 19, 2010
Back in 2008 when I delved fairly deep into NMEA 2000 fuel management (1-Garmin, 2-FloScan, 3-Raymarine, 4-Maretron, 5-SmartCraft, and 6-Lowrance), I may have gotten a related concept wrong. While I was mostly experimenting with how fuel flow data gets integrated into an overall system, I noted a couple of times that if you have such data coming out of an electronically controlled engine, it should be more accurate than what can be measured by flow sensors. Well, as suggested by that "Assumed Fuel Consumption" label on that Steyr Motors display above, maybe not...
But, in fact, my main source on all this is the folks at FloScan! So I'm looking for some expertise from you all. Are you sure that the MPG readings on your snazzy electronic engine gauges is spot on? Do you understand more about the internal mechanics/electronics involved than I do (not hard)? My interest goes beyond curiosity (and not wanting to perpetuate myths). Gizmo is the sort of sweet power boat that runs well at many speeds, but according to that curve she using at least three times the fuel at 16 knots (2,200 rpms) that she is at 8 (about 1,300 rpms). I want to know where the sweet spots are, and I want to see how they change with different loads, sea conditions, amounts of bottom fouling, etc.. Please help if you can.
